ParaPathology

Beyond the glass — adjacent topics to diagnostic pathology that the group tracks and writes about

← Home · Onboarding

What this is

ParaPathology is the group’s umbrella for work that sits next to — rather than inside — diagnostic pathology. Topics that shape how pathology is practiced, funded, taught, and communicated, but aren’t themselves “which diagnosis is this.”

Repository

What lives here

  • Pathologist workload and workflow — observational studies of how pathologists actually spend their time.
  • Education and training — curriculum notes, teaching experiments, trainee feedback loops.
  • Communication — how pathology results reach clinicians and patients, plain-language reporting, patient-facing summaries.
  • Policy and practice — guidelines, reporting standards, quality metrics as they change.
  • Tools of the trade — reviews of software, instruments, and services that pathologists use daily but rarely write about.

Adjacent work in the group

Contribution flow

  1. Pick a topic that’s pathology-adjacent and under-documented.
  2. Draft with a clear thesis — what is the single claim, and what evidence supports it?
  3. Link to primary data where applicable (operational studies in the Quality Research cluster are the usual source).

Conventions

  • Opinion is allowed, but mark it. “In our experience at Memorial…” is a useful qualifier.
  • Data beats anecdote. If the workstream has operational numbers available, cite them.
  • Respect the field’s diversity. Memorial’s practice patterns are not universal; frame recommendations as local unless they generalize.

Pitfalls

  • Don’t conflate ParaPathology essays with research outputs. These are reflection and synthesis pieces, not peer-reviewed claims.
  • Keep policy discussions up to date — guidelines change; a note from 2022 may mislead a reader in 2026.